Long-term Outcomes After Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty Compared With Penetrating Keratoplasty for Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) compared with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for corneal endothelial dysfunction [Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and bullous keratopathy (BK)]. METHODS: In this systematic review, we searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase up to May 2022 and considered all types of studies addressing our objective. Graft survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was the main outcome. RESULTS: Fifty cohort studies were included. At 5 years, in FECD and BK, graft survival seemed higher after EK than PK. Two comparative studies showed either a higher 5-year graft survival after EK than PK or no significant differences. Including noncomparative studies, in FECD, the 5-year graft survival ranged from 0.69 to 0.98 for PK, from 0.93 to 1.00 for DSEK, and from 0.93 to 0.99 for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). In BK, the 5-year graft survival ranged from 0.39 to 0.91 for PK, from 0.65 to 0.89 for DSEK, and from 0.84 to 0.95 for DMEK. The 10-year graft survival ranged from 0.20 to 0.90 for PK and from 0.62 to 0.92 for EK. The mean 5-year best spectacle-corrected visual acuity ranged from 0.73 to 0.43 LogMAR for PK, from 0.61 to 0.09 for DSEK, and from 0.31 to 0.05 for DMEK. The 5-year rejection rate ranged from 11.0% to 28.7% for PK, from 5.0% to 7.9% for DSEK, and from 1.7% to 2.6% for DMEK. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a higher 5-year graft survival and better secondary outcomes after EK. Nevertheless, the level of evidence was low. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021260614.

Treatment outside the Recommended Guidelines for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): Prevalence, Characteristics, and Issues.

This study aims to assess the prevalence and characteristics of preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated outside the recommended guidelines. In this retrospective monocentric cohort, we included all premature children treated in our department for ROP by laser photoablation or anti-VEGF intravitreal injection. The main outcome was treatment of both eyes for ROP less severe than pre-threshold type 1, treated outside ETROP guidelines. A total of 114 children received treatment for ROP in our department, among whom 32 (28.1%) children received treatment for indications outside the ETROP guidelines for both eyes. The indications outside the guidelines were persistent stage 2 or 3 ROP that showed no evidence of regression after 41 weeks of corrected gestational age (11 children; 34.4%), pre-plus stage (11; 34.4%), difficulties in disease staging (7; 21.9%), type 2 ROP with plus disease (2; 6.2%), and treatment due to logistical difficulties (1; 3.1%; hospitalized in neonatal units hundreds of miles away from our department, with no fundus examination possible in the neonatal unit). To resume, in our cohort, 28.1% of children received treatment for ROP less severe than pre-threshold type 1 both eyes. The main indications for off-label treatment were the persistence of active ROP during follow-up and the presence of pre-plus-stage disease. Our data suggest the need to update ROP treatment criteria to reflect real-life practices. Additional studies are required in order to evaluate the long-term benefits and side effects of treatments outside the recommended indications, and to establish revised treatment guidelines.